Dearica Hamby’s lawsuit against the Las Vegas Aces has officially been dismissed, bringing a quiet close to one of the most controversial player-rights cases in recent WNBA history. According to Front Office Sports, both Hamby and the Aces mutually agreed to end the case, with each side covering its own legal fees and costs. No settlement details were disclosed.
Hamby originally filed the lawsuit alleging she was discriminated against and traded because she was pregnant. The claims sent shockwaves through the league, reigniting long-standing conversations about how professional sports organizations treat pregnant athletes and working mothers. For many fans and players, the case symbolized a larger fight — not just about one trade, but about respect, protection, and power.
The controversy was amplified when the WNBA previously investigated the situation and penalized the Aces for violating league rules related to player benefits. That decision appeared to validate some of Hamby’s concerns and positioned the league as taking a stand on pregnancy protections. As a result, expectations grew that the lawsuit would bring further accountability or clarity.
Instead, the case ends without a trial, public findings, or financial resolution. The dismissal leaves unanswered questions about what occurred behind the scenes and why both parties chose to walk away. For supporters of Hamby, the outcome may feel unsatisfying — a reminder of how difficult it can be for players to challenge powerful organizations. For others, it may signal a desire from both sides to move forward and avoid prolonged legal battles.
While the lawsuit is over, its impact is not. Hamby’s willingness to speak out forced uncomfortable conversations the league could no longer ignore. Even without a courtroom verdict, the case has already influenced how pregnancy, player rights, and workplace protections are discussed in women’s basketball — and those conversations are far from f
